The
lecture will explore the link between theories of the public sphere and
democratic theory more generally. Democratic theory focuses on
accountability and responsiveness in the decision-making process;
theories of the public sphere focus on the role of public communication
in facilitating or hindering this process. More specifically, the
lecture will seek to define the democratic public sphere in the form of
reviewing four traditions of democratic theory, exploring the answers
they suggest for the public sphere and, more particularly, for the
normative criteria of mass media discourse in Western liberal
democracies. In a more matter-of-fact language, the questions about
normative criteria of the public sphere could be formulated as follows:
What qualities should the public sphere have to cultivate a vital
democratic public life? What characteristics the participants –
citizens (actors of public sphere) – should posses, what should be the
form and content of their contributions to public discourse and how
should the actors communicate with each other? What are the desirable
outcomes of the process of communication in the public sphere?
In the end, the normative criteria will be summarized and condensed in the following table:
Theory types |
Criteria for a good democratic public discourse |
|
Who participates |
In what sort of process |
How ideas should be presented |
Outcome of relation between discourse and decision-making |
Representative liberal |
Elite dominance
Expertise Proportionality |
Free marketplace of ideas
Transparency |
Detachment Civility |
Closure |
Participatory liberal |
Popularinclusion
|
Empowerment |
Range of styles |
Avoidance of imposed closure |
Discursive |
Popular inclusion |
Deliberative
|
Dialogue
Mutual respect
Civility |
Avoidance of premature, nonconsensus-based closure |
Constructionist
|
Popular inclusion |
Empowerment
Recognition |
Narrative creativity |
Avoidance ofexclusionary closure
Expansion of the political community |
|