Univerzitet u Novom Sadu
Centar za evropske studije i istraživanja - CAESAR


Predavanje:
Models of Citizenship and Public Sphere
Predavač:
Dr Ana Dević
University of Aarhus
Vreme:
Četvrtak, 19. januar 2006.  12:00 časova
Mesto:
Svečana sala Rektorata
Predavanje će biti na engleskom jeziku.

Biografija predavača
Predavanje: anaDevic.pdf, 194 KB
Apstrakt:
The lecture will explore the link between theories of the public sphere and democratic theory more generally. Democratic theory focuses on accountability and responsiveness in the decision-making process; theories of the public sphere focus on the role of public communication in facilitating or hindering this process. More specifically, the lecture will seek to define the democratic public sphere in the form of reviewing four traditions of democratic theory, exploring the answers they suggest for the public sphere and, more particularly, for the normative criteria of mass media discourse in Western liberal democracies. In a more matter-of-fact language, the questions about normative criteria of the public sphere could be formulated as follows: What qualities should the public sphere have to cultivate a vital democratic public life? What characteristics the participants – citizens (actors of public sphere) – should posses, what should be the form and content of their contributions to public discourse and how should the actors communicate with each other? What are the desirable outcomes of the process of communication in the public sphere?

In the end, the normative criteria will be summarized and condensed in the following table:

Theory types Criteria for a good democratic public discourse

Who participates In what sort of process How ideas should be presented Outcome of relation between discourse and decision-making
Representative liberal Elite dominance

Expertise Proportionality
Free marketplace of ideas

Transparency
Detachment Civility Closure
Participatory liberal Popularinclusion
Empowerment Range of styles Avoidance of imposed closure
Discursive Popular inclusion Deliberative
Dialogue
Mutual respect
Civility
Avoidance of premature, nonconsensus-based closure
Constructionist
Popular inclusion Empowerment
Recognition
Narrative creativity Avoidance ofexclusionary closure
Expansion of the political community